![]() ![]() It explains that when a pear is first encountered in Example newl圜reated #5 it cements the scope to that 1 pear (only that pear is faded). The above hypothesis appears to agree with everything we've seen so far. Perhaps, the first time an object is encountered in an action, its scoping is cemented for the rest of the event (including any scoping inherited from conditions, naturally). Who knows how exactly it works under the hood? But I can start to cobble together a hypothesis: Only the newly created pear is faded. This all seems pretty inconsistent and weird. In the above example (exactly the same as the preceding one, except that the tilting action is applied to apples instead of pears) the c reate new pear action does indeed affect scope. Regardless, as long as you remain aware of this idiosyncrasy, it's not likely to cause you many problems. Hopefully this will help you get an intuitive sense of why Fusion only scopes objects from the left. And since computers have a much lower tolerance for ambiguity than humans do, you can imagine that a computer would struggle to make that inference. There's something a bit off about the second statement, right? You can still infer that Fred's spoon came from the same drawer that was the third from the top, but it's not 100% clear. The drawer was the third from the top, and Fred got himself a spoon It's a bit like, instead of saying.įred went to the the third drawer, and got himself a spoon While that second statement isn't exactly broken, it's kind of.odd, right? The focus of the sentence seems now to be the number 100, so it doesn't feel entirely right to assume that we're talking about any specific pears. ![]() If 100 is less than the Y position of a pear, then rotate the pear. If the Y position of a pear is greater than 100, then rotate the pear. The first statement, essentially, reads as follows: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |